While reading Jacob's Room, coupled with "On not
Knowing Greek," I was struck by the problems of language and
translation--not only of translating Greek, but of translating the body through
writing. By reading the Greek plays, or letters from loved ones, the reader
must translate the writer's body into the readers space to gain any
understanding. Likewise, the writer must translate their body onto the page to
be understood. The problems with translation are the gaps in understanding that
are left through the navigation of time and space; whether that be a gap in
understanding the language, the culture, or the "place" of the author
upon writing.
Woolf opens her
essay "On not Knowing Greek" with the following passage:
For it is vain and
foolish to talk of knowing Greek, since in our ignorance we should be at the
bottom of any class of schoolboys, since we do not know how the words sounded,
or where precisely we ought to laugh, or how the actors acted, and between this
foreign people and ourselves there is not only difference of race and tongue
but a tremendous breach of tradition. All the more strange, then, is it that we
should wish to know Greek, try to know Greek, feel for ever drawn back to
Greek, and be for ever making up some notion of the meaning of Greek, though
from what incongruous odds and ends, with what slight resemblance to the real
meaning of Greek, who shall say? (Woolf, "Greek")
Ironically, she
begins by saying that it is foolish for girls to want to learn Greek, as they
would be at the bottom of a class of boys, and that they can't understand the
"difference of race and tongue…[or] tradition." The same could be
said for boys, who also can't get back to the original sounds and meanings. But
she continues on in the essay describing Greek literature as though she has
learned Greek, and has been able to "know [Electra], that we have picked
up from little turns and twists of the dialogue hints of her character, of her
appearance, which, characteristically, she neglected; of something suffering in
her, outraged and stimulated to its utmost stretch of capacity," (Woolf,
"Greek"). She hints at some understanding of Greek after having just
told the reader that it is "foolish to talk of knowing Greek."
Woolf also
seems to claim that the time and space that have been traveled lends unintended
meaning to the Greek. She says, when reading a Greek play,
at
once the mind begins to fashion itself surroundings. It makes some background,
even of the most provisional sort, for Sophocles; it imagines some village, in
a remote part of the country, near the sea. Even nowadays such villages are to
be found in the wilder parts of England, and as we enter them we can scarcely
help feeling that here, in this cluster of cottages, cut off from rail or city,
are all the elements of a perfect existence (Woolf, "Greek").
When translating a
Greek play, the reader can’t help but to place the play in his or her current
space. One does not imagine an Ancient Greek village, but a contemporary
English village. The meaning of the play, the knowing of the characters,
depends on the space in which they are read and understood.
In Jacob’s Room, Woolf also looks at the problems
of translation. She states, “A strange this--when you come to think of it--this
love of Greek, flourishing in such obscurity, distorted, discouraged, yet
leaping out, all of a sudden” (Woolf, Jacob's
Room 77). For Jacob, Greek is obscure, distorted, and discourage, and
yet “Jacob knew no more Greek than served him to stumble through a play"
(Woolf, Jacob's Room 78). The term
“stumble” leaves the reader to believe that Jacob can’t get full meaning or
understanding from the Greek, but can only get the meaning he creates for it
based upon the space he occupies, where meaning “leap[s] out, all of a sudden,
especially on leaving crowded rooms, or after a surfeit of print, or when the
moon floats among the waves of the hills” (Woolf, Jacob's
Room 77). By changing space – moving out of a crowded room – meaning
becomes suddenly apparent.
Much like
Greek, the letters in Jacob’s Room must
be translated. The difference in language and culture is presumably smaller,
but the reader must keep in mind how words can hold different meanings for
different people. Each person’s background and experiences shape how that
individual understands the world. Woolf says of letters in Jacob’s Room
Still,
there are letters that merely say how dinner's at seven; others ordering coal;
making appointments. The hand in them is scarcely perceptible, let alone the
voice or the scowl. Ah, but when the post knocks and the letter comes always
the miracle seems repeated -- speech attempted. (Woolf, Jacob's Room 97)
The translation of
the letter’s conveying concrete information is simple—be ready for dinner at
seven, bring this amount of coal, etc. But the translation of a writer’s body
(hand) and voice is an attempt at speech, translating the written to spoken and
attempting to recreate the author in the reader’s space.
No comments:
Post a Comment